Human Trafficking & Theft By Deception

with examples from trial
Play Video

Cheating To Win

Warren Mosler Supercars Controversy Exposed

  • ALL of Warren Mosler’s Supercars that he used to compete in publicized press events had “Cheatermotors.” The Warren Mosler supercars controversy reveals that Mosler supercars became infamous for competitive advantages. Thus, he whipped his competitors who played fair by having brass knuckles under the boxing gloves
    • I am ashamed that I participated in that. I knew, but didn’t say anything.   No longer.
    • The scumbags work hard to silence would-be whistleblowers. The Warren Mosler supercars controversy has drawn attention due to concerns over his vehicle modifications. org gives any whistleblower the mathematical power to resolve complex/amorphous observations into a SINGULAR NUMBER that makes it perfectly clear if the person/system being evaluated is a bribe-taker (or not).
  • The Car & Driver Lightning Lap 2008 victory by the 2008 Mosler MT900s should be eliminated from the records because of the below facts. The Mosler MT900s 2008 Car & Driver Lightning Lap win is under scrutiny. These Warren Mosler supercars controversy allegations have raised questions about fairness in racing

What Happened with Warren Mosler Supercars Controversy?

    • The vehicle had a 630hp built race motor instead of the as-certified 505hp Chevrolet LS7 stock motor that went through emissions.
    • The Warren Mosler supercars controversy includes concerns over CARB (California Air Resources Board) regulations. CARB required a 25.8lb flywheel, but these supercars featured an 11lb racing flywheel, which is why the car would buck at low speeds.
    • The “winning” vehicle featured longtube headers and ultralight high-flow catalysts that have no chance of passing emissions. ALL Mosler supercars (with the exception of the 2012 Mosler RaptorGTR) were built and sold with these longtube headers and ultralight catalysts.   Thus Warren Mosler claimed on the MSO’s an extra 30 horsepower over the stock Chevrolet engine.
    • Mosler Automotive (‘MACC’) didn’t even have EPA Certification for the 2008 Model Year. It did for the 2009 Model Year, but didn’t build any cars until 2010; which made them intrinsically illegal.   Of course, they were all build with the Cheater-Catalysts and Cheater-Flywheels, too.Warren Mosler supercars controversy2008 Warren Mosler supercars controversy
  • The Warren Mosler supercars controversy highlights the Car & Driver Lightning Lap 2011 victory by the ‘2011/2012’ Mosler Photon, which some argue should be eliminated from the records due to the following facts.
    • The vehicle had a 630hp built race motor, and had ZERO CERTIFICAITON WORK WHATSOEVER. There wasn’t even an EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) application submitted.
      • This vehicle was a PERSONAL TOY for Warren Mosler himself, that was SUBSIDIZED BY AMERICAN TAXPAYERS (see the Tax Evasion section, and Mr. Mosler’s sworn testimony below).
      • Bear in mind that this man is shadow-controlling your money.
    • CARB (California Air Resources Board) required a 25.8lb flywheel. This motor featured an 6lb racing flywheel.  Jason Cammisa tested this vehicle at Palm Beach International Raceway, and wrote: “…uses a flywheel with about as much rotational inertia as a spinning, dying housefly”.
      • You can read Warren Mosler’s modified version of this article on his MoslerEconomics.com website à https://moslereconomics.com/2011/05/06/mosler-photon-in-automobile-magazine/
      • Mosler’s site features “Modern Monetary Theory”, which secretly intends to scam you into servitude (“Cheating To Win” on a whole other level). Check out ModernMonetaryTheory-Scam.com if you dislike the idea of becoming a Peasant serving the “Liberal Elite”.
    • The “winning” vehicle featured longtube headers and ultralight high-flow catalysts that have no chance of passing emissions.
    • In Mosler’s [irrationally obsessive] quest for ultralight weight; the passengers’ spines became a fleshy element of the crash structure. No crash testing was done of the nutty rear subframe that Mosler insisted be done by and outside shop:  I wouldn’t do it.
    • I apologize for my participation in the Supercar scam.
    • Don’t forget to check out Warren Mosler’s sworn testimony and produced documents about TAX EVASION – you paid for Mosler’s toys – below the photos. Reports suggest that taxpayer-subsidized supercars by Warren Mosler fueled his projects.😊

Trial Transcript  Warren Mosler testifying pg 693 ln 24 – pg 694 ln 12

24· · · · Q· · Does the first page refresh your recollection

25· ·as to when that was — that car was completed, the  ·

1· ·approximate timeframe?

2· · · · A· · Let me take a look.· Well, March 2009, so

3· ·probably not long after that, a few months maybe.· It

4· ·looks like it was a couple of months away.

5· · · · Q· · That car was — that car became the Photon,

6· ·correct?

7· · · · A· · Yeah.

8· · · · Q· · All right.· And now the Photon was a car that

9· ·was — that you had championed and you wanted to be the

10· ·face of the company, wasn’t it?

11· · · · A· · It’s a car I wanted to build.· I actually

12· ·wanted to have it for myself.

Trial Tr.  Warren Mosler testifying pg 697 ln 19 – 21

19· · · · Q· · Okay.· And you mentioned earlier that you

20· ·would have sold it if somebody wanted to buy it, right?

21· · · · A· · No.·

MORE TAXPAYER-SUBSIDIZED TOYS FOR MOSLER’S RICH BOYS (including one used for Insurance Fraud)

Trial Transcript,  Warren Mosler testifying pg 755 ln 9 – 25·

9· · · · Q· · Okay.· So here we have — on May 6th you wrote

10· ·and you attached this article, correct?

11· · · · A· · Yeah.

12· · · · Q· · Okay.· And then Mr. Olofsson wrote back — you

13· ·wrote to him at 7:33 attaching the article.· At

14· ·9:12 a.m. he wrote back “Do you have one for me.”

15· · · · A· · Right.

16· · · · Q· · Okay.· Indicating that he wanted to buy it,

17· ·right?

18· · · · A· · No.· I was going to give it to him.

19· · · · Q· · Oh, okay.

20· · · · A· · He wasn’t buying it.

21· · · · Q· · Oh, okay.· Just like you had given one to Alan

22· ·Simon?

23· · · · A· · Yeah.

24· · · · Q· · Did you give one to Ms. Klaker’s husband?

25· · · · A· · Randy, yeah.

  1. Thomas Olaffsson Gift – Principal of Mosler’s $57,000,000,000 Hedge Fund (subsidized by taxpayers):Warren Mosler supercars controversy
  2. Alan Simon Gift – Mosler’s personal lawyer (subsidized by taxpayers, then used for Insurance Fraud):Warren Mosler supercars controversy
  3. Randal Klaker Gift (Subsidized by taxpayers):Warren Mosler supercars controversy